data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ab3aa/ab3aa7bb96fd9d87eed7ca4650157732831d706c" alt="" |
TABLE 1. List of herpetofaunal taxa published on or after 1 January 2000 that can be objectively classed as unscientific, non-peer reviewed, misguided in intent or presentation, fraudulent, or lacking evidence. These names should not be used in herpetological nomenclature, pending suitable action by the ICZN. |
2013. Best Practices: In the 21st Century, Taxonomic Decisions in Herpetology are Acceptable Only When Supported by a Body of Evidence and Published via Peer-Review. Herpetological Review. 44(1), 8–23.
Australasian Journal of Herpetology | Apr 2012