Rohanixalus vittatus (Boulenger, 1887) comb. nov. from Andaman Islands, India. in Biju, Garg, Gokulakrishnan, Chandrakasan, Thammachoti, et al., 2020. photo: S.D. Biju facebook.com/BijuSDas |
Abstract
The taxonomy of the Asian tree frog genus Feihyla has been in a state of flux ever since its proposal in 2006. Allocation of species to Feihyla remains confusing, particularly with respect to the closely related genus Chirixalus (formerly Chiromantis sensu lato). At the same time, several Chirixalus species are known only from cursory descriptions and remain poorly studied. In this study, we review the systematics of the genus Feihyla and clarify the generic placement of its members along with all other species currently assigned to Chirixalus. Based on integrative evidence gathered from new collections, examination of types and original descriptions, morphological comparisons, phylogenetic relationships inferred from a multi-gene (three mitochondrial + two nuclear) 1,937 bp dataset, as well as reproductive modes including egg-laying, nesting behaviour, and clutch morphology, our results show that the six species formerly attributed to Feihyla represent three morphologically and phylogenetically distinct groups: (1) the type species of the genus, F. palpebralis, along with F. fuhua constitute the Feihyla palpebralis group or Feihyla sensu stricto; (2) F. inexpectata and F. kajau represent the Feihyla vittiger group and are closely related to the Feihyla palpebralis group; (3) ‘F. hansenae’ and ‘F. vittata’ constitute another distinct and reciprocally monophyletic lineage, more closely related to Chirixalus + Chiromantis. In light of long-standing taxonomic confusions and unresolved phylogenetic relationships, we propose recognition of a new genus to accommodate ‘F. hansenae’ and ‘F. vittata’ in order to stabilise the classification of several Asian rhacophorid species that have been frequently confused and transferred within the Chirixalus–Chiromantis–Feihyla complex. Based on integrative evidence, eight species previously attributed to the genus Chirixalus or Feihyla are formally transferred to Rohanixalus gen. nov., two Chirixalus members are allocated to Feihyla, and one synonymised with Rhacophorus bipunctatus. In addition, we report the first member of the tree frog family Rhacophoridae from the Andaman Islands of India—Rohanixalus vittatus, along with description of its male advertisement call, reproductive behaviour including parental care by the female, and larval morphology. Extended distributions are also provided for Rohanixalus species across Northeast India. The study further reveals the presence of potentially undescribed diversity in the new genus. Altogether, the revised classification and novel insights presented herein will facilitate a better working taxonomy for four phylogenetically distinct but morphologically related groups of Old World tree frogs.
Keywords: Chiromantis, Chirixalus, egg attendance, gel-nesting, generic reallocation, integrative taxonomy, larval morphology, molecular phylogeny, Rohanixalus gen. nov., species groups
Class Amphibia Linnaeus, 1758
Order Anura Fischer von Waldheim, 1813
Family Rhacophoridae Hoffman, 1932
Subfamily Rhacophorinae Hoffman, 1932
Genus Feihyla
Original description. Feihyla Frost, et al., 2006
Frost, Grant, Faivovich, Bain, Haas, Haddad, de S, Channing, Wilkinson, Donnellan, Raxworthy, Campbell, Blotto, Moler, Drewes, Nussbaum, Lynch, Green, and Wheeler 2006. The amphibian tree of life. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History. 297: 1–370.
Type species. Philautus palpebralis Smith, 1924
[= Feihyla palpebralis (Smith, 1924)]
Common name. Jelly-nest Tree Frogs
Etymology. The gender of this generic name is feminine. According to the original description, the generic nomen of Feihyla is derived from Fei (the last name of Chinese herpetologist, Prof. Fei Liang) + hyla (Greek: vocative form of Hylas, a traditional generic root for treefrogs) to honour the former’s extensive contributions to Chinese herpetology (Frost et al. 2006).
Feihyla palpebralis group
Species included. Feihyla fuhua Fei, Ye, and Jiang, 2010 and Feihyla palpebralis (Smith, 1924).
Feihyla fuhua Fei, Ye, and Jiang, 2010
White-cheeked Jelly-nest Frog
Feihyla palpebralis (Smith, 1924)
Vietnamese Jelly-nest Frog
Philautus palpebralis Smith, 1924.
Feihyla vittiger group
Species included. Feihyla inexpectata (Matsui, Shimada, and Sudin, 2014), Feihyla kajau (Dring, 1983), Feihyla samkosensis (Grismer, Thy, Chav, and Holden, 2007) comb. nov., and Feihyla vittiger (Boulenger, 1897) comb. nov.
Feihyla inexpectata (Matsui, Shimada, and Sudin, 2014)
Bornean Jelly-nest Frog
Chiromantis inexpectatus Matsui, Shimada, and Sudin, 2014
Feihyla kajau (Dring, 1983)
White-eared Jelly-nest Frog
Rhacophorus kajau Dring, 1983. Dring J. C. M. 1983.
Feihyla samkosensis (Grismer, Thy, Chav, and Holden, 2007) comb. nov.
Samkos Jelly-nest Frog
Chiromantis samkosensis Grismer, Thy, Chav, and Holden, 2007.
Feihyla vittiger (Boulenger, 1897) comb. nov.
Javan Jelly-nest Frog
Ixalus vittiger Boulenger, 1897.
Genus Rohanixalus gen. nov.
Etymology. The genus is named after Rohan Pethiyagoda, in appreciation of his contributions to herpetological and ichthyological studies in Asia. The generic epithet is derived from Rohan + genus name Ixalus Dumeìril and Bibron, 1841 (a traditional suffix in rhacophorid generic names). For nomenclatural purposes, the gender of this generic name is masculine.
Common name. Rohan’s Tree Frogs
Type species. Ixalus vittatus Boulenger, 1887 (= Rohanixalus vittatus comb. nov.)
Distribution. The genus Rohanixalus gen. nov. is restricted to South, Southeast, and East Asia, where it is currently known from India: Northeastern Indian states (Arunachal Pradesh, Assam, Manipur, Nagaland, Mizoram, and Tripura) and the Andaman Islands; Bangladesh: Sylhet Division; Myanmar; Thailand; Laos; Cambodia; China (Yunnan, Guangxi, Hainan, and Tibet); Vietnam; Malaysia; and the Sumatran island of Indonesia (Fig. 4).
Diversity. Currently there are eight nominal taxa in the new genus: Rohanixalus baladika (Riyanto and Kur- niati, 2014) comb. nov.; Rohanixalus hansenae (Cochran, 1927) comb. nov.; Rohanixalus marginis (Chan, Grismer, Anuar, Quah, Grismer, Wood, Muin, and Ahmad, 2011) comb. nov.; Rohanixalus nauli (Riyanto and Kurniati, 2014) comb. nov.; Rohanixalus punctatus (Wilkinson, Win, Thin, Lwin, Shein, and Tun, 2003) comb. nov.; Rohanixalus senapatiensis (Mathew and Sen, 2009) comb. nov.; Rohanixalus shyamrupus (Chanda and Ghosh, 1989) comb. nov.; Rohanixalus vittatus (Boulenger, 1887) comb. nov.
Rohanixalus vittatus in life, from Andaman Islands, India. |
ปาดจิ๋วพม่า Rohanixalus vittatus (Boulenger, 1887)
ปาดจิ๋วศรีราชา Rohanixalus hansenae (Cochran, 1927)
ปาดจิ๋วมลายู Rohanixalus marginis (Chan, Grismer, Anuar, et al., 2011)
S. D. Biju, Sonali Garg, G. Gokulakrishnan, Sivaperuman Chandrakasan, Panupong Thammachoti, Jinlong Ren, C. Gopika, Karan Bisht, Amir Hamidy and Yogesh Shouche. 2020. New Insights on the Systematics and Reproductive Behaviour in Tree Frogs of the Genus Feihyla, with Description of A New Related Genus from Asia (Anura, Rhacophoridae). Zootaxa. 4878(1); 1–55. DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4878.1.1