Showing posts with label Sri Lanka. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Sri Lanka. Show all posts

Tuesday, March 12, 2019

[Botany • 2018] Morphometrics and Taxonomic Update to the Sri Lankan Aponogeton (Aponogetonaceae)


Aponogeton natans (L.) Engler & Krause

Manawaduge & Yakandawala, 2018. 

Abstract
The recent studies on Sri Lankan Aponogeton underline the necessity of a taxonomic revision for the genus; especially with the recent discovery of two new endemic taxa and their described morphological affinities, revealing some misconceptions in the key morphological features used in identification and the overlapping morphology of the species within the genus. Accordingly, a morphometric analysis was carried out with 78 field collected specimens representing all six Sri Lankan Aponogeton species. The results indicate that A. kannangarae, a recently described endemic species which has been stated as closely resembling A. rigidifolius, is more similar to A. jacobsenii, with shared morphological characters, raising doubts if it is a distinct species. Further, the endemic A. jacobsenii, previously described and illustrated as a species with rarely occurring floating leaves, has been now described as with no floating leaves. Based on the results, a taxonomic update is presented with a key, full synonymy, descriptions and photographs.

Keywords: Monocots, Aponogeton jacobsenii, Aponogeton kannangarae, Aquatic plants, Cluster analysis, Morphology, Phenetics


Aponogeton natans (L.) Engler & Krause
in Krause & Engler (1906)


Aponogetonaceae Planchon (1856: tab. 4894)
(as ‘Aponogetaceae’), nom. cons. 

Type:— Aponogeton (Linnaeus 1781: 32).


Aponogeton Linnaeus (1781: 32)
Type:— Aponogeton natans (Linnaeus 1771: 226) Engler & Krause 
in Krause & Engler (1906: 11).

1. Aponogeton dassanayakei Manawaduge et al. (2016a: 251)

2. Aponogeton natans (L.) Engler & Krause in Krause & Engler (1906: 11)

3. Aponogeton crispus Thunberg (1784: 73) (as ‘A. crispum’)

4. Aponogeton rigidifolius Bruggen (1962: 91)

5. Aponogeton jacobsenii Bruggen (1983: 120)

6. Aponogeton kannangarae De Silva et al. (2016: 220)


Chapa Manawaduge and Deepthi Yakandawala. 2018. Morphometrics and Taxonomic Update to the Sri Lankan Aponogetonaceae. Phytotaxa. 365(3); 201–224. DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.365.3.1

Friday, March 8, 2019

[Herpetology • 2019] Cnemaspis ingerorum • A New Diminutive, Rupicolous Species of Day-gecko (Squamata: Gekkonidae: Cnemaspis) from southern Sri Lanka


Cnemaspis ingerorum  
Batuwita, Agarwal & Bauer, 2019


Abstract
A new species of Cnemaspis is described from southern Sri Lanka. Cnemaspis ingerorum sp. nov. was previously confused with C. kumarasinghei. The new species differs from C. kumarasinghei in having a lower number of ventral scales across midbody, scales on ventral sides of forelimb and hind-limb smooth (versus keeled) and dorsal caudal scales unkeeled (versus keeled). Additionally, Cnemaspis ingerorum sp. nov. has a 4.5% uncorrected ND2 sequence divergence from C. kumarasinghei and is also geographically separated from this species. Existing molecular data supports C. silvula as the sister species of the new form, however, it differs from C. silvula by the absence of keeled pectoral and abdominal scales and dorsal scales, and the absence of keeled (versus keeled) subcaudal scales.

Keywords: Reptilia, Cnemaspis kumarasinghei, dry zone, forest, gekkonid, lizard






Sudesh Batuwita, Ishan Agarwal and Aaron M. Bauer. 2019. Description of A New Diminutive, Rupicolous Species of Day-gecko (Squamata: Gekkonidae: Cnemaspis) from southern Sri Lanka. Zootaxa. 4565(2); 223–234. DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4565.2.6  

Wednesday, February 20, 2019

[Herpetology • 2019] Aspidura desilvai • A New Species of Aspidura Wagler, 1830 (Squamata: Colubridae: Natricinae) from Knuckles, World Heritage Site, Sri Lanka


Aspidura desilvai
Wickramasinghe, Bandara, Vidanapathirana & Wickramasinghe, 2019


Abstract
We describe a new speciesAspidura desilvai sp. nov., closely resembling A. trachyprocta and the last addition to the genus A. ravanai, from Knuckles massif, Matale District, of Sri Lanka. The species represents the ninth species of the genus known from Sri Lanka, and is readily distinguished from all other congeners by its colour pattern, the scale nature in the ischiadic region, and morphometric characteristics specially from its ratio between the snout to eye distance to its eye width. The species is currently known only from the type locality.

Keywords: Reptilia, Aspidura ravanai, A. trachyprocta, central highlands, Knuckles, Roughside snakes, South Asia, systematics


FIGURE 2. Dorsal aspect of Aspidura desilvai sp. nov., the holotype male (NMSL-NH 2019.01.02) in life.



Aspidura desilvai sp. nov.

Etymology. The species is named in honor of Pilippu Hewa Don Hemasiri de Silva (Dr. P. H. D. H. de Silva), a former Director (1965-1981) of the National Museums of Sri Lanka. In recognition of his tireless services to the country, while in service and through his many publications specially as the author of the book titled “Snake Fauna of Sri Lanka, with special reference to skull, dentition and venom in snakes”. The species epithet desilvai is a noun in the genitive case. 

Suggested common names. desilvage madilla, and de Silva’s Rough-Side Snake in native Sinhala language and English language respectively. [මැඩිල්ලන්]


L. J. Mendis Wickramasinghe, Imesh Nuwan Bandara,  Dulan Ranga Vidanapathirana and Nethu Wickramasinghe. 2019. A New Species of Aspidura Wagler, 1830 (Squamata: Colubridae: Natricinae) from Knuckles, World Heritage Site, Sri Lanka. Zootaxa. 4559(2); 265–280. DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4559.2.3


Wednesday, January 30, 2019

[Herpetology • 2019] Pseudophilautus conniffae • A New Species of Pseudophilautus (Anura: Rhacophoridae) from southern Sri Lanka


Pseudophilautus conniffae 
 Batuwita, De Silva & Udugampala, 2019


ABSTRACT
We describe a new Pseudophilautus species, P. conniffae sp. nov. from southern Sri Lanka.  It was previously confused with Pseudophilautus rus (Manamendra-Arachchi & Pethiyagoda).   The new species differs from the latter by the combination of the following characters: fourth toe webbing to penultimate subarticular tubercle on inner and outer sides (vs. fourth toe webbing in between penultimate and anetpenultimate subarticular tubercles on inner and outer sides), presence of conical median lingual process (vs. absent), and black patches on the posterior flank, anterior and posterior edges of the thigh (vs. black patches on the anterior surface of the thigh).  Pseudophilautus conniffae sp. nov. may be sympatric with P. limbus (Manamendra-Arachchi & Pethiyagoda), which shares certain characters with the new species.  The new species is, however, distinguished from P. limbus by the following characters: having supernumerary tubercles on manus (vs. lacking), absence of frontoparietal ridges (vs. presence), fourth toe webbing to penultimate subarticular tubercle on both sides (vs. fourth toe webbing between penultimate and anetpenultimate subarticular tubercle on both sides), third toe webbing to distal subarticular tubercle on both sides (vs. distal subarticular tubercle on outer side and below penultimate subarticular tubercle on inner side), and having the dorsum light brown with dark brown patches (vs. black and yellow variegated pattern on dorsum).  The new species may be restricted to the southwestern wet zone of Sri Lanka.  It is compared with all known Pseudophilautus species and also provided with a field key to identify it from those species that are sympatric with it or inhabit the southwestern wet zone.

Keywords: Dediyagala, Pseudophilautus rus, Pseudophilautus silvaticus, lowland rainforest


 Pseudophilautus conniffae sp. nov.:
[upper] live coloration of male from Hiyare forest Reserve (not preserved),
[lower] live coloration of female paratype, NMSL WCSG 0002, 30.7mm SVL from Dediyagala Forest Reserve.

 Pseudophilautus conniffae sp. nov. live coloration of male from Hiyare forest Reserve (not preserved).

 Pseudophilautus conniffae sp. nov. live coloration of female paratype, NMSL WCSG 0002, 30.7mm SVL from Dediyagala Forest Reserve.

 Pseudophilautus conniffae sp. nov.
Conniff’s Shrub Frog

Diagnosis: Mature male holotype 23.5mm in SVL. Tympanum discernible. Dorsal surface of body glandular, with prominent warts. Supratympanic fold prominent. Canthal edges more or less straight. Skin on head co-ossified with cranium. Nuptial pads absent. Median lingual process present, small and conical. Tarsal tubercle present. Supernumerary tubercles present on manus and pes. Toes medially webbed. Chest and belly heavily granular. Large, dark brown more or less square-shaped blotch on middorsum between forelimbs. Anterior and posterior surfaces of thigh and posterior flank region with black and white patches (Image 1D).
....

Etymology: The species name is an eponym honoring Karen Iynn Conniff for her generous support for the establishment of the WCSG and for her efforts to document the Odonata of Sri Lanka.


Sudesh Batuwita, Madura De Silva and Sampath Udugampala. 2019. Description of A New Species of Pseudophilautus (Amphibia: Rhacophoridae) from southern Sri Lanka.  Journal of Threatened Taxa. 11(1); 13120-13131. DOI:  10.11609/jott.3903.11.1.13120-13131

Tuesday, January 22, 2019

[Entomology • 2019] Revision of the Bamboo Leafhopper Tribe Mukariini (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae: Deltocephalinae) from the Indian Subcontinent with Description of New Genera and Species


Buloria indica Viraktamath & Webb, 2019


Abstract
Leafhopper genera and species of the tribe Mukariini from the Indian subcontinent are revised. Nine genera and 22 species including two new genera, one new subgenus and 12 new species are dealt with. The new taxa described are Aalinga gen. nov. with its type species Aalinga brunoflava sp. nov. (India: Andaman Islands), Buloria indica sp. nov. (India: Karnataka). Buloria zeylanica sp. nov. (Sri Lanka), Flatfronta bella sp. nov. (India: Karnataka; Bangladesh), Mohunia bifurcata sp. nov. (Myanmar), Mukaria omani sp. nov. (India: Gujarat, Karnataka, Madhya Pradesh), Mukaria vakra sp. nov. (India: Karnataka), Mukariella gen. nov. with its type species Mukariella daii sp. nov. (India: Manipur), Myittana (Benglebra) cornuta sp. nov. (India: Karnataka), Myittana (Myittana) distincta sp. nov. (India: Karnataka), Myittana (Savasa) subgen. nov. with its type species Myittana (Savasa) constricta sp. nov. (India: Andhra Pradesh, Gujarat, Haryana, Himachal Pradesh, Karnataka, Madhya Pradesh, Punjab, Tamil Nadu, Uttarakhand) and Scaphotettix arcuatus sp. nov. (India: West Bengal, Meghalaya, Mizoram). Genera Buloria Distant (new placement), Crispina Distant (new placement) and Myittana Distant (new placement) are placed in the tribe Mukariini. Genus Mohunia is redefined based on the study of its type species. Benglebra Mahmood & Ahmed 1969 is synonymised with Myittana Distant 1908 and considered as its subgenus. Myittana (Benglebra) alami (Mahmood & Ahmed) comb. nov., Myittana (Savasa) bipunctata (Mahmood & Ahmed) comb. nov.. Myittana (Benglebra) introspina (Chen & Yang 2007) comb. nov. and Mukariella bambusana (Li & Chen) comb. nov. are proposed; the first two species were earlier placed in the genus Benglebra, the third species in the genus Mohunia and the fourth in the genus Mukaria. Genera Flatfronta Chen & Li and Myittana are new records for India and Scaphotettix striata Dai & Zhang is a new record for the Indian subcontinent and Sri Lanka. All taxa dealt with are described and illustrated and keys for genera and their species are also given.

Keywords: Hemiptera, Mukariinae, Buloria, Crispina, Myittana, bamboo, morphology



 C.A. Viraktamath and M.D. Webb. 2019. Revision of the Bamboo Leafhopper Tribe Mukariini (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae: Deltocephalinae) from the Indian Subcontinent with Description of New Genera and Species. Zootaxa. 4547(1); 1–69. DOI:  10.11646/zootaxa.4547.1.1

Saturday, January 19, 2019

[Herpetology • 2019] Cnemaspis nilgala • A New Species of the Genus Cnemaspis Strauch, 1887 (Squamata: Gekkonidae) from the Nilgala Savannah forest, Uva Province of Sri Lanka


Cnemaspis nilgala 
Karunarathna, Bauer, de Silva, Surasinghe, Somaratna, Madawala, Gabadage, Botejue, Henkanaththegedara & Ukuwela, 2019

Nilgala Day Gecko • නිල්ගල දිවාසැරි හූනා  ||  DOI:  10.11646/zootaxa.4545.3.4  
Photos: Madhava Botejue facebook.com/SuranjanKarunarathna  

Abstract
A new species of Cnemaspis Strauch, 1887 is described from Nilgala Savannah Forest in Sri Lanka. The new species is diagnosed from all other congeners by the following suite of characters: small body size (SVL< 33 mm), dorsal scales on trunk homogeneous, one pair of post mentals separated by a single small chin scale, ventral scales on trunk smooth, subimbricate, 17–19 scales across the belly. Subdigitals scansors smooth, entire, unnotched; lamellae under digit IV of pes 17 –18. Males with femoral pores on each thigh but lacking precloacal pores. Median row of subcaudals smooth, subimbricate, enlarged and in an irregular series of subhexagonal scales. This new species had been previously confused with Cnemaspis alwisi Wickramasinghe & Munidradasa, 2007. The new species differs from Cnemaspis alwisi by having 122–129 ventral scales (versus 146–152), 7–8 supralabials (versus 8–10), and relatively shorter SVL ranging between 31.5–32.9 mm (versus 37.8–39.9 mm). Further, the new species is genetically divergent from Cnemaspis alwisi, the species that it closely resembles by 13.5% and 7.8% from its sister species in the ND2 gene. The present discovery highlights the need for dedicated herpetofaunal explorations in Sri Lanka, especially the intermediate bioclimatic zone and associated cave systems and rock outcrops.

Keywords: Reptilia, Autecology, Conservation, Microendemic, Reproduction, Systematics, Threats






FIGURE 3. Cnemaspis nilgala sp. nov. male paratype (2018.06.02.NH) live in-situ (a) dorsolateral view of the full body; (b) dorsal view of the full body; (d) cloacal characters, femoral pores, and subcaudals pattern; (d) dorsal head; (e) lateral head; (f) ventral head; (g) smooth ventral area of the body; (h) subdigital lamellae on pes (Photos: Madhava Botejue).

Cnemaspis nilgala sp. nov.

Etymology. The species name is an eponym (nilgala) for the region it inhabits, the Nilgala savannah forest in Sri Lanka, formed here as a noun in apposition. 

Suggested vernacular names. The vernacular names suggested for the species are: Nilgala diva-sari huna - නිල්ගල දිවාසැරි හූනා (in Sinhala), Nilgala pahal-palli (in Tamil), Nilgala day gecko (in English).  


 Suranjan Karunarathna, Aaron M. Bauer, Anslem De Silva, Thilina Surasinghe, Lankani Somaratna, Majintha Madawala, Dinesh Gabadage, Madhava Botejue, Sujan M. Henkanaththegedara & Kanishka D. B. Ukuwela. 2019. Description of A New Species of the Genus Cnemaspis Strauch, 1887 (Reptilia: Squamata: Gekkonidae) from the Nilgala Savannah forest, Uva Province of Sri Lanka. Zootaxa. 4545(3); 389–407. DOI:  10.11646/zootaxa.4545.3.4  

  

Thursday, December 27, 2018

[Ichthyology • 2018] Rasboroides vaterifloris & P. pallidus • Undocumented Translocations Spawn Taxonomic Inflation in Sri Lankan Fire Rasboras (Actinopterygii, Cyprinidae)



(A–D) Rasboroides vaterifloris Deraniyagala, 1930
(E–JRasboroides pallidus Deraniyagala, 1958

in Sudasinghe, Herath, Pethiyagoda & Meegaskumbura, 2018. 

Abstract
A recent (2013) taxonomic review of the freshwater-fish genus Rasboroides, which is endemic to Sri Lanka, showed it to comprise four species: R. vaterifloris, R. nigromarginatus, R. pallidus and R. rohani. Here, using an integrative-taxonomic analysis of morphometry, meristics and mitochondrial DNA sequences of cytochrome b (cytb) and cytochrome oxidase subunit 1 (coi), we show that R. nigromarginatus is a synonym of R. vaterifloris, and that R. rohani is a synonym of R. pallidus. The creation and recognition of unnecessary taxa (‘taxonomic inflation’) was in this case a result of selective sampling confounded by a disregard of allometry. The population referred to R. rohani in the Walawe river basin represents an undocumented trans-basin translocation of R. pallidus, and a translocation into the Mahaweli river of R. vaterifloris, documented to have occurred ca 1980, in fact involves R. pallidus. A shared haplotype suggests the latter introduction was likely made from the Bentara river basin and not from the Kelani, as claimed. To stabilize the taxonomy of these fishes, the two valid species, R. vaterifloris and R. pallidus, are diagnosed and redescribed, and their distributions delineated. We draw attention to the wasteful diversion of conservation resources to populations resulting from undocumented translocations and to taxa resulting from taxonomic inflation. We argue against translocations except where mandated by a conservation emergency, and even then, only when supported by accurate documentation.

Figure 4: Live color pattern variation in A–D, Rasboroides vaterifloris; E–J, R. pallidus.
(A) topotypes of R. vaterifloris, Kalu basin, Gilimale; (B–D) topotypes of population identified as R. nigromarginatus by Batuwita, De Silva & Edirisinghe (2013), Kalu basin, Athwelthota; (E) Bentara basin, Pitigala; (F) topotypes of population identified as R. rohani by Batuwita, De Silva & Edirisinghe (2013), Walawe basin, Suriyakanda; (G) Bentara basin, Yagirala; (H) Gin basin, Udugama; (I) Bentara basin, Yagirala; (J) Bentara basin, Pitigala. (A, B, D, E, F, G, H) males; (C, I, J) females. Specimens not collected.

 Live color pattern variation in Rasboroides vaterifloris.
(A) topotypes of 
R. vaterifloris, Kalu basin, Gilimale; (B–D) topotypes of population identified as R. nigromarginatus by Batuwita, De Silva & Edirisinghe (2013), Kalu basin, Athwelthota.
 (A, B, D) males; (C) females. Specimens not collected.

Rasboroides vaterifloris Deraniyagala, 1930
Rasbora vaterifloris Deraniyagala, 1930: 129
Rasbora nigromarginata Meinken, 1957: 65–68
Rasbora vaterifloris var. nigromarginatus Deraniyagala, 1958: 137
Rasboroides nigromarginatus (Meinken, 1957): Batuwita, De Silva & Edirisinghe, 2013

Diagnosis. Males of Rasboroides vaterifloris can be distinguished from males of R. pallidus by having the unbranched rays of dorsal, anal, pectoral and pelvic fins black along their entire length, more distinctly evident in the last unbranched ray of the dorsal fin (vs. the mentioned rays being the same color as other rays; in preserved specimens, interradial membranes of dorsal, anal, pelvic and pectoral fins with distinct, scattered melanophores (vs. absent or vaguely present only around the beginning). Females of R. vaterifloris have a lesser body depth (27.2–31.9% SL vs. 31.7–35.5) than those of R. pallidus.

Live color pattern variation in Rasboroides  pallidus. (E) Bentara basin, Pitigala; (F) topotypes of population identified as R. rohani by Batuwita, De Silva & Edirisinghe (2013), Walawe basin, Suriyakanda; (G) Bentara basin, Yagirala; (H) Gin basin, Udugama; (I) Bentara basin, Yagirala; (J) Bentara basin, Pitigala.
 (E, F, G, H) males; (I, J) females. Specimens not collected.

Rasboroides pallidus Deraniyagala, 1958
Rasbora vaterifloris pallida Deraniyagala, 1958: 136.
Rasbora vaterifloris ruber Deraniyagala, 1958: 136.
Rasbora vaterifloris rubioculis Deraniyagala, 1958: 136.
Rasboroides rohani Batuwita, De Silva & Edirisinghe, 2013

Diagnosis. The males of Rasboroides pallidus can be distinguished from the males of R.  vaterifloris by having the unbranched rays of dorsal, anal, pectoral and pelvic fins the same color as other branched rays (vs. black along their entire length); in preserved specimens, interradial membranes of dorsal, anal, pelvic and pectoral fins without distinct scattered melanophores throughout or with only minute, vague melanophores only around the beginning (vs. melanophores distinctly present). The females of R. pallidus have greater body depth (31.7–35.5% SL vs. 27.2–31.9) than females of R. vaterifloris.


Conclusion: 
As a freshwater-fish genus endemic to Sri Lanka and restricted largely to streams draining the island’s dwindling rainforest estate, Rasboroides attracts considerable conservation attention. The National Red List (MOE, 2012) treats ‘R. nigromarginatus’ as Critically Endangered and R. vaterifloris as Endangered. The synonymy of these two nominal species demonstrated here allows their ranges to be combined, widening their extent of occurrence and area of occupancy and hence potentially lowering the threat-status of R. vaterifloris. Although ‘R. rohani’ has not as yet been assessed for conservation purposes, its restriction to a small population at a single locality would almost certainly have caused it to be ranked as Critically Endangered. Given that we show here that it represents only an undocumented translocation of R. pallidus, its population is now only of marginal conservation concern. Indeed, of the two valid species of Rasboroides, R. pallidus enjoys the wider range and hence warrants less conservation concern, especially given its successful translocation to two river basins (Mahaweli and Walawe) in which it did not previously occur.

In describing ‘R. rohani’ as a new species, Batuwita, De Silva & Edirisinghe (2013) were misled by apparently collecting only the largest specimens for their sample while neglecting to account for allometric growth. It is additionally regrettable that the type series of ‘R. rohani’ designated by these authors cannot be identified in the collection of the National Museum of Sri Lanka, in which it was stated to be deposited.

Both translocations referred to in this paper were made by well-meaning citizens but without the safeguards that should apply in such cases. Perhaps most egregiously, no records were published of the rationale for translocation or the precise identity and origin of the source population. We urge that any future attempts to introduce species to novel habitats be guided by IUCN/SSC (2013) and that the intentional release or introduction of species without legal sanction be prohibited in Sri Lanka.


Hiranya Sudasinghe, Jayampathi Herath, Rohan Pethiyagoda and Madhava Meegaskumbura. 2018. Undocumented Translocations Spawn Taxonomic Inflation in Sri Lankan Fire Rasboras (Actinopterygii, Cyprinidae). PeerJ. 6:e6084.  DOI: 10.7717/peerj.6084

Friday, November 23, 2018

[Herpetology • 2019] Diversification of Shrub Frogs (Rhacophoridae, Pseudophilautus) in Sri Lanka – Timing and Geographic Context



in Meegaskumbura, Senevirathne, Manamendra-Arachchi, et al., 2019. 

Highlights
Pseudophilautus diversification, begins during Oligocene (31 MYA)
• A stately pace of lineage accumulation despite orogeny and climate change.
• Assemblages in most regions comprise of species arising from diverse clades.
• MRCA of a back-migrating clade to India (8.8 MYA), reconstructs as a lowland form.
 • Island’s mountains serve as species pumps and refuges for Pseudophilautus evolution.

Abstract
Pseudophilautus comprises an endemic diversification predominantly associated with the wet tropical regions of Sri Lanka that provides an opportunity to examine the effects of geography and historical climate change on diversification. Using a time-calibrated multi-gene phylogeny, we analyze the tempo of diversification in the context of past climate and geography to identify historical drivers of current patterns of diversity and distribution. Molecular dating suggests that the diversification was seeded by migration across a land-bridge connection from India during a period of climatic cooling and drying, the Oi-1 glacial maximum around the Eocene-Oligocene boundary. Lineage-through-time plots suggest a gradual and constant rate of diversification, beginning in the Oligocene and extending through the late Miocene and early Pliocene with a slight burst in the Pleistocene. There is no indication of an early-burst phase of diversification characteristic of many adaptive radiations, nor were there bursts of diversification associated with favorable climate shifts such as the intensification of monsoons. However, a late Miocene (8.8 MYA) back-migration to India occurred following the establishment of the monsoon. The back migration, however, did not trigger a diversification in India similar to that manifest in Sri Lanka, likely due to occupation of available habitat, and consequent lack of ecological opportunity, by the earlier radiation of a sister lineage of frogs (Raorchestes) with similar ecology. Phylogenetic area reconstructions show a pattern of sister species distributed across adjacent mountain ranges or from different parts of large montane regions, highlighting the importance of isolation and allopatric speciation. Hence, local species communities are composed of species from disparate clades that, in most cases, have been assembled through migration rather than in situ speciation. Lowland lineages are derived from montane lineages. Thus, the hills of Sri Lanka acted as species pumps as well as refuges throughout the 31 million years of evolution, highlighting the importance of tropical montane regions for both the generation and maintenance of biodiversity.

Keywords: Ancestral-area reconstruction, Biogeography, Ecological opportunity, Diversification, Molecular dating, Speciation




 Madhava Meegaskumbura, Gayani Senevirathne, Kelum Manamendra-Arachchi, Rohan Pethiyagoda, James Hanken and Christopher J. Schneider. 2019. Diversification of Shrub Frogs (Rhacophoridae, Pseudophilautus) in Sri Lanka – Timing and Geographic context. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. In Press. DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2018.11.004


Monday, August 27, 2018

[Herpetology • 2018] Lankanectes pera • A New Frog Species (Anura, Nyctibatrachidae) from Rapidly Dwindling Cloud Forest Streams of Sri Lanka


Lankanectes pera  
Senevirathne, Samarawickrama, Wijayathilaka, Manamendra-Arachchi, Bowatte, Samarawickrama & Meegaskumbura, 2018


Abstract
The monotypic genus Lankanectes, considered an evolutionary long branch with India’s Nyctibatrachus as its sister lineage, is represented by L. corrugatus, a species widely distributed within the wet zone of Sri Lanka up to 1500 m asl, where it inhabits a variety of lotic and lentic habitats. Here, following an integrative taxonomic approach using DNA-based phylogenies, morphology, morphometry, and ecological niche models, we describe a new species — Lankanectes pera sp. nov. The new species is distinguished from its sister species mainly by its tuberculated throat and absence of dark patches on venter, throat, manus and pes. The uncorrected genetic distances between the two Lankanectes species for a fragment of the non-coding mitochondrial 16S rRNA gene is 3.5–3.7%. The new species has a very restricted climatic distribution with a total predicted area of only 360 km2 (vs. 14,120 km2 for L. corrugatus). Unlike L. corrugatus, which prefers muddy substrates and marshy areas, the new species is observed inhabiting only pristine streams flowing through canopy covered montane forests in the highest reaches of the Knuckles Mountain range. The specialized new species will need immediate conservation attention due to its restricted distribution (montane isolate), specialized habit of inhabiting clear mountain streams, and small population size.

Keywords: Amphibia, Ecological niche models, General lineage concept, Knuckles Mountains, Montane-isolate



Lankanectes pera sp. nov. in life, SVL 22.40 mm; Dorsolateral view

Lankanectes pera, sp. nov. 

Etymology. The specific epithet pera is applied as a noun in apposition. It is a reference to the University of Peradeniya, Sri Lanka, affectionately referred to as “Pera” by its alumni. 

Distribution: Lankanectes pera sp. nov. is restricted to streams flowing through the montane forests on highest peaks of the Knuckles Mountain range—1100 m asl, in Dothalugala and Bamabarella and Riverston regions.




 Gayani Senevirathne, V.A.M.P.K. Samarawickrama, Nayana Wijayathilaka, Kelum Manamendra-Arachchi, G. Bowatte, D.R.N.S. Samarawickrama and Madhava Meegaskumbura. 2018. A New Frog Species from Rapidly Dwindling Cloud Forest Streams of Sri Lanka—Lankanectes pera (Anura, Nyctibatrachidae).  Zootaxa. 4461(4); 519–538. DOI:  10.11646/zootaxa.4461.4.4

  

Thursday, August 2, 2018

[Herpetology • 2018] First Appearance Deceives Many: Disentangling the Hemidactylus triedrus species complex Using An Integrated Approach; Hemidactylus whitakeri & H. sahgali


Hemidactylus triedrus Daudin, 1802

Hemidactylus whitakeri 
 Hemidactylus sahgali
Mirza​, Gowande, Patil, Ambekar & Patel, 2018
  DOI: 10.7717/peerj.5341 

 Abstract
The gekkonid lizard genus Hemidactylus Oken is the second most species-rich genus of geckos with greatest diversity in the tropical regions of the world. Some species of the genus are commensal and widespread; however, there are several endemic lineages with restricted distribution. India is home to at least 35 species, with 20 endemic species and the number is steadily increasing with exploration of new habitats and integrated taxonomic approach including molecular data. We made investigations into the molecular and morphological variation throughout the distribution of Hemidactylus triedrus Daudin, 1802 based on fresh specimens, literature review, museum material and molecular data. Results from morphological, molecular and micro-CT based anatomical data are unequivocal and show that H. triedrus is a species complex represented by three species, H. triedrus sensu stricto and two undescribed taxa. H. subtriedrus Jerdon, 1854 syn. nov. was found to be morphologically similar to the type specimen of H. triedrus, and genetically embedded in a clade containing H. triedrus sensu stricto and is here treated as a junior synonym of H. triedrus, whereas H. lankae Deraniyagala is referred to as nomen dubium given that the types are presently not traceable and the original description is inadequate in diagnosing the taxon. The populations from western-central India and parts of Pakistan, and from southern Karnataka are distinct and diagnosable, and are herein described as two new species, respectively. Morphological and molecular data support the distinctiveness of the new species. The present work resolves a taxonomic turmoil that lasted over two centuries highlighting the need for studies that integrate morphological and molecular data.

....


Hemidactylus triedrus species group
Species included: H. triedrus, H. sahgali sp. nov., H. whitakeri sp. nov.

Definition: Members of the group grow to a medium size ranging from 45–74 mm in SVL with a rather robust habitus. Dorsum with distinct dark bands may be edged with white or lighter shade of brown. Scales on the dorsal aspect of trunk granular intermixed with large keeled sub-trihedral or trihedral tubercles arranged in 15–20 fairly regular rows. Supralabial eight to nine and infralabials seven to eight to angle of jaw. Lamellae on digit one of manus and pes range from seven to eight and on digit four of manus and pes range from 8–10. Males possess a series of 7–15 precloacal femoral pores interrupted medially by a diastema of one to three non-pored scales. A single or a pair of sub-conical to rounded post cloacal spur. Tail with usually eight keeled tubercles in a whorl on segment I, the number subsequently reduces with progression of tail segments.

Distribution: Widespread across dry zones of India and Sri Lanka and parts of Pakistan.

Figure 4: Coloration in life of Hemidactylus triedrus.
 (A) male NCBS AU703 from Nellore, (B) an uncollected female from Pondicherry, (C) uncollected juvenile from Pondicherry.

Hemidactylus triedrus Daudin, 1802
Gecko triedrus Daudin, 1802:155
Hemidactylus triedrus Lesson, 1834:311; Boulenger, 1885:133 (in part); Smith, 1935:88 (in part)
Hemidactylus subtriedrus Jerdon, 1854:467; Smith, 1935:89 syn. nov.
Hemidactylus triedrus lankae Somaweera & Somaweera, 2009:180
Hemidactylus lankae Bauer et al., 2010:350

Diagnosis: A medium sized fairly stout gecko, adults ranging 58–76 mm in SVL. Dorsum in a shade of light brown with paired, thin black edged white bands at regular intervals. Dorsal scalation on trunk, granular, intermixed with enlarged, keeled 19–20 trihedral tubercle rows arranged in fairly regular longitudinal series. Seven lamellae under digit I of pes and manus, eight to nine under digit four of manus and pes. An angular series of seven to nine precloacal femoral pores separated at mid-pelvic by a diastema of one to three non-pored scales.

Suggested common name: Southern termite hill gecko.

Natural history: A species generally associated with termite mounds. Several individuals of different age classes can be seen occupying a single mound. Individuals can be seen at the entrance of the openings of termite mounds just after dusk and will retreat in the mound with the slightest disturbance. Juveniles when disturbed will attain a posture with their bodies high and the tail is moved slowly in a curling and uncurling manner, likely to draw attention toward the tail. Several individuals were found in a single mound when the termite mound was dug, along with scorpions of the genus Heterometrus sp., and frogs of the genus Uperodon sp. Individuals also seek shelter under boulders, abandoned houses during the day emerging just after dusk. Mostly terrestrial in its habits but will climb trees too. Breeding likely takes places from February to May as hatchlings and eggs have been seen in the months of April–May in Pondicherry and Kanyakumari. Occupies areas that are dry like scrub, dominated with boulders and even in cities closer to the coast. Widely distributed from Visakhapatnam in north to Kanyakumari in south and recorded from elevation ranging from 17 to 1,913 m AMSL. Recorded from the following states/Union territories in India: Kerala, Tamil Nadu, Andhra Pradesh and Pondicherry (Fig. 6).


Figure 7: Coloration in life of Hemidactylus whitakeri sp. nov. (A) Holotype female NCBS AU712, (B) uncollected juvenile from Bangalore.

Hemidactylus whitakeri sp. nov.
Hemidactylus subtriedrus Bauer et al., 2010
Hemidactylus triedrus Bansal & Karanth, 2010

Diagnosis: A medium sized fairly stout gecko, adults ranging 45–60 mm in SVL. Dorsum in a shade of light brown with paired, thin black edged white bands at regular intervals. Dorsal scalation on trunk granular, intermixed with enlarged, keeled 16–17 sub-trihedral tubercle rows arranged in fairly regular longitudinal series on dorsum. Seven lamellae (rarely six) under digit I of pes and manus, eight to nine under digit four of manus and pes. An angular series of seven to eight precloacal femoral pores separated at a mid-pelvic by a diastema of three non-pored scales.

Etymology: The specific epithet is a patronym honoring Romulus Earl Whitaker for his valuable contribution toward the study and conservation of reptiles of India.

Suggested common name: Whitaker’s termite hill gecko.

Natural history: The types were found moving actively at a quarry site around 20:30 h. The holotype female contains two eggs in her body cavity suggesting that this species breeds during the months of November. Several hatchlings of the new species were encountered at Kengiri near Bangalore in the month of April. Similar in its habits to H. triedrus and can be seen on termite mounds. Its distribution is not well known and known from Bangalore in the state of Karnataka and the Nilgiri district in Tamil Nadu (Fig. 6).


Figure 9: Coloration in life of Hemidactylus sahgali sp. nov.
(A) Paratype female NCBS AU709, (B) an uncollected male from Gautala Wildlife Sanctuary, Maharashtra, (C) uncollected juvenile from Pune.

Hemidactylus sahgali sp. nov.
Hemidactylus triedrus Boulenger, 1885:133 (in part); Smith, 1935:88 (in part); 
Minton, 1966:85; Bauer et al., 2010

Diagnosis: A medium sized fairly stout gecko, adults ranging 56–78 mm in SVL. Dorsum in a shade of light brown with paired, broad black edged white bands at regular intervals. Dorsal scalation on trunk, granular, intermixed with enlarged, keeled 15–16 trihedral tubercle rows arranged in fairly regular longitudinal series. Seven to eight lamellae under digit I of pes and manus, 8–10 under digit four of manus and pes. An angular series of 11–15 precloacal femoral pores separated at a mid-pelvic by a diastema of one to three non-pored scales.

Etymology: The specific epithet is a patronym honoring Bittu Sahgal, Editor and founder of Sanctuary Asia magazine for his contribution toward conservation of wildlife.

Suggested common name: Sahgal’s termite hill gecko.

Natural history: A species associated with termite mounds as its related species H. triedrus. Found in dry open scrub areas with boulders. Seen actively moving about on the ground just after dusk. Hatchlings have been seen in the month of May. Distributed throughout the Deccan Traps, its distribution extends beyond the traps north-west into Pakistan. In India, it is recorded from the following states: Maharashtra, Gujarat, Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan and Chhattisgarh records ranging in elevation from 11 to 1,191 m AMSL. All records of the species from Pakistan are from elevation ranging from 15 to 25 m AMSL.


Zeeshan A. Mirza​, Gaurang G. Gowande, Rishikesh Patil, Mayuresh Ambekar and Harshil Patel. 2018. First Appearance Deceives Many: Disentangling the Hemidactylus triedrus species complex Using An Integrated Approach.  PeerJ. 6:e5341  DOI: 10.7717/peerj.5341

    

Saturday, June 23, 2018

[Ornithology • 2017] On Temminck’s Tailless Ceylon Junglefowl, Gallus ecaudatus, and How Darwin denied their Existence


 Lithograph of Gallus ecaudatus, based on specimen RMNH. AVES.224888, by Jean-Gabriel Prêtre prepared c.1806 for an illustrated work in three volumes that Temminck intended to publish on pigeons and Galliformes.

in van Grouw, Dekkers & Rookmaaker, 2017.
Bull. B.O.C. 137(4) 

  Summary
Ceylon Junglefowl was described in 1807 by the Dutch ornithologist Coenraad Jacob Temminck. The specimens he examined were tailless (‘rumpless’) and therefore he named them Gallus ecaudatus. In 1831 the French naturalist René Primevère Lesson described a Ceylon Junglefowl with a tail as Gallus lafayetii (= lafayetii), apparently unaware of Temminck’s ecaudatus. Subsequently, ecaudatus and lafayetii were realised to be the same species, of which G. stanleyi and G. lineatus are junior synonyms. However, Charles Darwin tried to disprove the existence of wild tailless junglefowl on Ceylon in favour of his theory on the origin of the domestic chicken. 


‘The tailless cock inhabits the immense forests of the island of Ceylon’ (Temminck 1813: 268). 

 ‘… but this statement [tailless fowls are wild in Ceylon] … is uterly false’ (Darwin 1868: 259).


Figure 2. Lithograph of Gallus ecaudatus, based on specimen RMNH. AVES.224888, by Jean-Gabriel Prêtre prepared c.1806 for an illustrated work in three volumes that Temminck intended to publish on pigeons and Galliformes. Only the volume on pigeons was published, in 1808, and the two volumes on Galliformes never appeared due to a confict between Temminck and the French illustrator of the frst volume, Pauline Knip (Dickinson et al. 2010). Instead, Temminck later published Histoire naturelle générale des pigeons et des gallinacés in three volumes (1813–15) without any colour illustrations. The reference ‘Gall. v. 1. pl. Enl.’ in Temminck’s published catalogue (1807) refers to the frst of the two unpublished volumes on Galliformes, which would have been vol. 2 of the complete work (Naturalis Biodiversity Center, Leiden)


Hein van Grouw, Wim Dekkers and Kees Rookmaaker. 2017. On Temminck’s Tailless Ceylon Junglefowl, and How Darwin denied their Existence. Bull. B.O.C. 137(4); 261-271